Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

Issues of Chronology and Periodization for the East Manych Culture: Analyzing Materials from Mounds of Chogray VIII

https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2025-79-3-532-546

Abstract

Goals. The article suggests a periodization of the East Manych Catacomb culture (EMCC). The first periodization consisted of groups of sites supposed to be archaeological cultures. The accumulation of materials made it necessary to use cultural definitions. And this gave rise to the East Manych Catacomb culture. But the large number of catacombs (catacomb types) required further differentiation. Materials and methods. The relative chronology of Middle Bronze Age catacomb burials in the Eastern Fore-Caucasus is established through stratigraphic analysis and correlations with technological and typological changes in ceramic funerary assemblages. The study focuses on sidelong burials in sub-mound Middle Bronze Age catacombs of the East Manych Catacomb culture. Results. The analysis into the examined grave sites of the Catacomb culture has yielded somewhat unexpected results. The depth of the burial chamber in relation to the entry pit has proved to correlate with both catacomb types and pottery technology and shapes ― and serves a chronological feature. So, T-shaped catacombs with chamber pit depths between 0 to 20 cm in relation to that of the entry pit contained red-ochre engobed vessels and censers on four-petal feet with vivid corded ornamental patterns, triangular and cylindrical estampages. In H-shaped catacombs with the mentioned parameter being over 1 m, the ornamental patterns on vessels virtually disappear, their molding materials and shapes change significantly. Censers of the East Manych Catacomb culture also tend to correlate with the two catacomb types, and evolutionize toward poorer and even absent ornamental patterns, reshaped feet with squared or rounded basements which was never mentioned before. Cups from the catacomb of Chogray 3/2 are identical to samples from Nogir, and attest to the early movement of Catacomb culture bearers toward the south of the Fore-Caucasus. Conclusions. The first stage demonstrates genetic and areal links between steppe and piedmont populations and corresponds to the initial phase of the Kuban-Terek culture, thus coinciding with the completion of dolmen construction. The later stage is marked by the advance of the EMCC population into the North Caucasian foothills followed by its disappearance.

About the Authors

Ksenia F. Karlova
Institute of Oriental Studies of the RAS (12/1, Rozhdestvenka St., 107031 Moscow, Russian Fe­deration)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (History), Senior Research Associate



Nadezhda A. Nikolaeva
Institute of Oriental Studies of the RAS (12/1, Rozhdestvenka St., 107031 Moscow, Russian Fe­deration)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (History), Senior Research Associate



Alexander V. Safronov
Institute of Oriental Studies of the RAS (12/1, Rozhdestvenka St., 107031 Moscow, Russian Fe­deration) MIREA – Russian Technological University (78, Vernadsky Ave., 119454 Moscow, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (History), Senior Research Associate, Associate Professor



References

1. Nikolaeva N. A. Chograysky sovkhoz, irrigated plot (Kalmyk ASSR): A 1986 excavation report. At: Institute of Archaeology (RAS), Archive. Coll. Ф-1. Cat. Р-1. File no. 11627–11627a. 84 p. (In Russ.)

2. Andreeva M. V. East Manych Catacomb Culture: Analyzing Materials of Grave Sites. Moscow: Taus, 2014. 272 p. (In Russ.)

3. Nechitaylo A. L. Suvorovskaya Mound Grave Field. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1979. 86 p. (In Russ.)

4. Nikolaeva N. A. Ethnocultural Processes in the North Caucasus, 3rd–2nd Millennia BCE: A Perspective from Ancient European and Near Eastern History. Moscow: Moscow Oblast University, 2011. 536 p. (In Russ.)

5. Nikolaeva N. A., Safronov A. V. A kurgan near the village of Nogir and the problem of cultural attribution of Middle Bronze Age monuments in North Ossetia. Bulletin of the Moscow Regional State University. Series: History and Political Sciences. 2020. No. 5. Pp. 164–179. (In Russ.)

6. Safronov V. A. Classifying and dating Bronze Age sites of the North Caucasus. In: Bandera O. N. (ed.) Archaeological Sites: Issues of Protection, Classification, and Use. Vol. 7. Moscow: Znanie, 1974. Pp. 23–174. (In Russ.)

7. Sinitsyn I. V. Ancient Sites of the East Manych. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Saratov: Saratov State University, 1978. 130 p. (In Russ.)

8. Sinitsyn I. V. Ancient Sites of the East Manych. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Saratov: Saratov State University, 1978. 117 p. (In Russ.)

9. Smirnov A. M. Bronze Age Mounds and Catacombs in the Seversky Donets Basin. Moscow: Miklouho-Maclay Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology (RAS), Institute of Archaeology, 1996. 181 p. (In Russ.)

10. Shishlina N. I. Bronze Age Northwestern Caspian, 5th–3rd Millennia BCE. Moscow: GIM, 2007. 400 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Karlova K., Nikolaeva N., Safronov A. Issues of Chronology and Periodization for the East Manych Culture: Analyzing Materials from Mounds of Chogray VIII. Oriental Studies. 2025;18(3):532-546. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2025-79-3-532-546

Views: 34


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)